Channel stats, last 30 days: 127 messages from 50 members.
🧊10👍1
#vendor-verification 2025-11-19
Wednesday28 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Channel stats, last 30 days: 127 messages from 50 members. 17:19
- revoked_ro — does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything 19:00
- spare_vial — is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution 19:02
- gall_bladder_gav — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 20:21
- gall_bladder_gav — quick one somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log 20:46
follow up the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
nothing gets deleted
lot number or nothing
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
thats not evidence
who decides, the mods or the room
sorry to jump in i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
revoked stays in the log
does a good result from Janoshik outweigh a bad one from VendorInvestigate
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
✅18
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
🙏3👀14😂6
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
right so is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel, we shall see
✅4
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
💀1
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
💀10
not a recommendation
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
blinded is better
ok so if you want to help, buy a lot, test it, and post the report with the lot number. that is the whole contribution
🎉1👀3❤️7
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
🤝16⚠️8✅2
quick one somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
📉5💀1🎉17
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier, from memory
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now