the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
#vendor-verification 2026-01-04
- quiet_head_qi — while im here nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with… 11:11
- lot_number_lou — we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern 12:25
- lot_number_lou — coming back to this update from 6 months ago: MKM added evidence and the entry now reflects it a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is… 16:44
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
the lot number on the certificate does not match my vial, what now
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
while im here nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
i have a result but i did not buy the lot myself, does that count
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
never for sale
how many independent results does a supplier need
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
revoked stays in the log
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
the log is readable chronologically and that is deliberate. the trajectory matters more than the current line
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
unrelated but we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry, happy to be corrected
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
thats evidence
who decides, the mods or the room
quick one i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
nothing gets deleted
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
slightly off topic but a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
coming back to this update from 6 months ago: MKM added evidence and the entry now reflects it
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel
pattern not one result
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel