a good result with bad sample handling gets logged with a note about the handling. context is part of the record
Thread · #vendor-verification · 2025-01-30
has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation
Spun off from a message in #vendor-verification on 2025-01-30. 17 messages, 3 participants.
The message this came from
- logrotate — has verification ever been reinstated after a revocation 18:20
what counts: an independent report, on a lot you bought yourself, with the lot number, from a lab the room recognises
how many independent results does a supplier need
who decides, the mods or the room
🎉18
thats evidence
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
does SSA being verified mean my vial is fine
👍3🔥17
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
does a good result from VendorInvestigate outweigh a bad one from PeptideMeter
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
✅3🧪16
blinded is better
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently