is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
#retatrutide 2025-12-09
Tuesday17 messages2 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- surpass_two — i said 2 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since 15:43
- surpass_two — slightly off topic but is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run 15:47
- surpass_two — did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers 18:15
- surpass_two — anyone gone above 7.5 and what changed 18:20
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule
sorry to jump in phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan
i said 2 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
👀11
the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting
slightly off topic but is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run
💀12📉7🧊9
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
how long before people saw the first change at 7.5
unrelated but stepping in 2.4 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
stopped for 10 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
research use only
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists
glucagon is the new bit
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived
[edited]did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers
🔥12👍2📉1
anyone gone above 7.5 and what changed
❤️13👍1😂2