anyone logging resting heart rate on this
#retatrutide 2026-05-20
- mag_citrate — PeptideMeter came back 99.4 on one lot and 96.8 on the next from the same SWB, both fine 18:39
- mag_citrate — sorry to jump in is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in… 19:52
- mag_citrate — does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel 19:54
- mag_citrate — my resting heart rate is up about 8 bpm, did that settle for anyone 19:58
- mag_citrate — phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan, i could be wrong reconstituted the 30 vial to 2.5mg/ml… 20:44
is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run
triple agonist yeah
anyone reconstituting 5 vials to 5 so the steps come out smaller
whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
lost 38kg over 21 months at doses well under what the trials used
smaller steps here
PeptideMeter came back 99.4 on one lot and 96.8 on the next from the same SWB, both fine
cant feel it honestly
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
low and slow
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start, for what its worth
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect, i think
the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting
glucagon is the new bit
unrelated but no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data
sorry to jump in is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial
does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel
TRIUMPH is phase 3
my resting heart rate is up about 8 bpm, did that settle for anyone
triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history, thats one data point
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps, i could be wrong
follow up anyone gone above 1 and what changed
phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan, i could be wrong
reconstituted the 30 vial to 2.5mg/ml specifically so i could take 0.5 without measuring crumbs
my resting rate went up 9 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 20
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use