while im here how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
#retatrutide 2026-06-12
- shame_and_meds — unrelated but triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history 18:50
- pioneer_pia — coming back to this the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial 18:51
- patent_2026 — nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data 18:54
- pioneer_pia — the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here 20:37
- pioneer_pia — anyone compared their VendorInvestigate purity across two different SGN lots 21:52
anyone stayed at 2.4 for months rather than climbing
is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme
lost 3kg over 18 months at doses well under what the trials used
unrelated but triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
coming back to this the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data
phase 2 only
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
no long term data
watching my heart rate
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
mine went up too
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right
anyone compared their VendorInvestigate purity across two different SGN lots