vialroom

#retatrutide 2026-06-21

Sunday58 messages12 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • evidence_or_not — did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end lost 28kg over 11 months at doses well under what the trials used 19:53
  • quiet.hours — while im here the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me 19:59
  • zoya_zeros — i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind reconstituted the 15 vial to 2.5mg/ml specifically so i could… 20:28
  • acetate_ash — sat at 2.5 for 7 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up, i could be wrong 22:21
  • acetate_ash — the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does, ask me again in a month 23:21
QH

phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan

YV

does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated

did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
lost 28kg over 11 months at doses well under what the trials used

👍15❤️3

lost 45kg over 24 months at doses well under what the trials used

🎉15💀2📉1

the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial, n of 1 obviously

QH

while im here the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me

👍3🧪14🤝3

triple agonist yeah

VB

Reminder for quiet.hours: dose day is today. Set 7 days ago.

Inter-lab diff for lot D-0718: 98.6% vs 96.8%. Within expected range.

🙏2
YV

held at 1.7 for 5 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain

no long term data

anyone compared their VendorInvestigate purity across two different SWB lots

TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule

VB

Inter-lab diff for lot SG-1177: 98.6% vs 96.8%. Within expected range.

👍1🧪1
MP

anyone gone above 10 and what changed

baseline  58
wk 2      61
wk 4      64
wk 6      67
wk 8      66
wk 10     65   (held dose from wk 7)
ZZ

i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
reconstituted the 15 vial to 2.5mg/ml specifically so i could take 7.5 without measuring crumbs

👍13🤝13
VB

Archive lookup: mg_per_ml first appears in this channel on 2025-12-30.

Archive lookup: mg_per_ml first appears in this channel on 2025-10-23.

CC

stepping in 7.5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again

watching my heart rate

MP

i said 6 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since, someone check my working

NN

nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is

there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists

JJ

VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on one lot and 98.6 on the next from the same CPC, both fine

sorry to jump in anyone reconstituting 10 vials to 2 so the steps come out smaller

NN

how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer

im at 7.5 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal

logging rhr daily

QH

i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch

vial-d-0718-front.png
900 × 1200 · 846 KB · not retained in the public archive
21:06quiet.hours pinned a message
VB

Inter-lab diff for lot F-1330: 99.4% vs 97.4%. Within expected range.

NN

triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history

MP

anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate

🙏2📈2
SA

energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me

back after 10 months, has anything actually been published since

SA

the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting

CC

my resting rate went up 8 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 23

cant feel it honestly

settled by month three

sat at 2.5 for 7 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up, i could be wrong

🧊17

*Janoshik not the other one

low and slow

🙏7🔥11
RO

for the archive triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right

research use only

smaller steps here

AA

i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps

AA

research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing

the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does, ask me again in a month

4🎉11🙏4